I saw that old film last night (as I love watching everything that has to do with the life of artists), and it made me think about the status of the artist.
There is a scene where Rafael says Michelangelo some disturbing things.
Raphael: For what is an artist in this world but a servant, a lackey for the rich and powerful? Before we even begin to work, to feed this craving of ours, we must find a patron, a rich man of affairs, or a merchant, or a prince or... a Pope. We must bow, fawn, kiss hands to be able to do the things we must do or die.
[chuckles]
Raphael: We are harlots always peddling beauty at the doorsteps of the mighty.
Michelangelo: If it comes to that, I won't be an artist.
Raphael: [scoffs] You'll always be an artist. You have no choice.
Of course, after the 19th century all this is supposed to have changed. It's a well known change in the way art and artists exist in the world.
Or has it changed? What needs to be done today for an artist to be able to live from his or her art? Different kind of patrons, but still you have to peddle beauty at the doorsteps of the mighty.
I think of all the successful modern artists. How many of them really felt in control? Picasso, maybe. But even so, wasn't he an exception?
I wonder how would Michelangelo take to our modern world. Or any of those renaissance greats. They would have produced different art, I bet.
There is a scene where Rafael says Michelangelo some disturbing things.
Raphael: For what is an artist in this world but a servant, a lackey for the rich and powerful? Before we even begin to work, to feed this craving of ours, we must find a patron, a rich man of affairs, or a merchant, or a prince or... a Pope. We must bow, fawn, kiss hands to be able to do the things we must do or die.
[chuckles]
Raphael: We are harlots always peddling beauty at the doorsteps of the mighty.
Michelangelo: If it comes to that, I won't be an artist.
Raphael: [scoffs] You'll always be an artist. You have no choice.
Of course, after the 19th century all this is supposed to have changed. It's a well known change in the way art and artists exist in the world.
Or has it changed? What needs to be done today for an artist to be able to live from his or her art? Different kind of patrons, but still you have to peddle beauty at the doorsteps of the mighty.
I think of all the successful modern artists. How many of them really felt in control? Picasso, maybe. But even so, wasn't he an exception?
I wonder how would Michelangelo take to our modern world. Or any of those renaissance greats. They would have produced different art, I bet.